The Argentine nice died from coronary heart failure in November 2020, the identical month he underwent profitable surgical procedure for a subdural hematoma, extra generally referred to as a blood clot on the mind.
Following the investigation, prosecutors say that Maradona’s medical group “violated the duties that every one was answerable for,” which subsequently “led to the deadly consequence of the affected person that, in any other case, may have been prevented,” in keeping with court docket paperwork.
Neurosurgeon Leopoldo Luque and psychiatrist Agustina Cosachov are amongst these charged after being criticized beforehand by medical investigators.
In November, Luque advised prosecutors about his skilled relationship with Maradona. “There is nothing to recommend I used to be negligent,” he mentioned.
In December, Cosachov’s lawyer advised CNN that his shopper “had used her finest judgment from a medical perspective.”
CNN was not instantly capable of attain representatives of Cosachov and Luque and the opposite people charged.
The accused will start to testify from May 31 and will face between eight to 25 years in jail if convicted.
The 60-year-old “didn’t have full use of his psychological schools” and will have had “a greater probability of survival” if he had been admitted to a healthcare facility, a medical board concluded in its report, which fashioned a part of the judicial investigation into this death.
Investigators have been trying into why the previous footballer was handled at a home throughout his closing days and whether or not his psychological state allowed him to make selections of his personal accord. They additionally appeared into an absence of remedy for his coronary heart situation, amongst different issues.
The board mentioned it’s potential to deduce “that the medical group seen totally and utterly the potential death of the affected person, have been utterly detached to the likelihood and did not change their conduct or remedy plan, sustaining the damaging omissions laid out beforehand, leaving the well being of the affected person ‘to probability.'”